Since we haven't yet said it on this blog, now would be as good a time as any to mention that Colin and I decided on a seminary just before we left: we're going to
Sewanee, a.k.a. The University of the South. Perhaps you've heard of it. Or perhaps you haven't, since, as we've been reminded SO many times since even considering the school, "it's in the middle of NOWHERE." Nowhere, in this case, can be found in southeast Tennessee, about 45 minutes northwest of Chattanooga, or an hour and 15 minutes from Nashville.
So what does our seminary choice have to do with the Holy Land? Let's start with our journey on Tuesday, from Jerusalem to "the Galilee" (as the locals say). Basically, I couldn't get over how rural (and removed from Jerusalem) Jesus' home turf seemed. I'd been told this by others, but it hit deeper to see it with my eyes: the place where Jesus spent most of his three years in itinerant ministry was definitely NOT the city -- not now, and to an even greater degree, not then.
Naturally (and not surprisingly), this only fueled my indignation about all the "middle of nowhere" comments we've heard about Sewanee. Jesus was a rural minister. Let me repeat. Jesus was a rural, small-town, itinerant preacher and healer. What's wrong with going to a rural place for seminary? Or -- heaven forbid -- even ending up in a rural church? Many of you know this is not a new issue or idea for me. I've
written about it (and talked about it) enough, or so I thought. But all of the comments about Sewanee (and all the not-so-subtle questions about how, exactly, we came to that choice, all of which implied we had a lot of explaining to do) have me riled up about rural marginalization again. And then visiting Galilee simply stoked the fire.
I asked our travel angel and guide, Canon Bill Broughton, how many people archaeologists think lived in Nazareth at the time of Jesus. "Oh, about 400. Those that get really wild think as many as 2,000." If this was a good enough place for Jesus' "spiritual formation," I'm going to assume that Sewanee, with it's 2,300 or so, will be good enough for us.
I love my friends who are doing great work in urban ministry. I've spent a good deal of time in urban settings, trying to do good work in ministry. Urban ministry is important, and I'm not trying to make the case that because Jesus worked in the country, we all should, too.
But how 'bout this: Could we at least take our call to ALSO care for rural places and communities seriously? Could we, within the church, at least culturally respect and honor those who choose to minister in middle-of-nowhere places that need healing just as much as inner-cities? I guess my big beef is that it's cool and respectable in the church to want to serve in the inner-city. Rural places, not so much. Ok, so maybe this all just comes out of my need to be cool. But I'd also like to issue a call, a challenge, a plea: instead of seeing rural communities and churches as places no minister wants to go (especially the young ones), couldn't we EXPECT that 17-20% of our ministers will creatively and passionately serve the 17-20% of Americans who live non-metropolitan lives?
Jesus, to put it very mildly, did a lot of good work in the country before heading into Jerusalem. In a similarly mild way, I guess I'm just asking that we not forget.
[The photo above, which sort of looks like the middle of nowhere, is actually the Sea of Galilee.]